JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)July 11, 2001

A- de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

✓Claimant Compañia Industrial De Frigorificos Ltda

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se dirimió el conflicto de competencia suscitado entre el Tribunal Administrativo del Atlántico y la Sala de Casación Laboral de la Corte Suprema de Justicia, para conocer de la acción de tutela promovida por la empresa de la referencia en contra del Tribunal Superior de Barranquilla, en el sentido de que su conocimiento corresponde al primero de los citados despachos judiciales.

En consecuencia, se remite el expediente al citado Tribunal para lo de su competencia.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (3 points)
  1. Primero. Dirimir el conflicto de competencia suscitado entre el Tribunal Administrativo del Atlantico y la Sala de Casacion Laboral de la Corte Suprema de Justicia, para conocer de la accion de tutela promovida por la Compania Industrial de Frigorificos Ltda. en contra del Tribunal Superior de Barranquilla, en el sentido de que su conocimiento corresponde al
  2. primero. de los citados despachos judiciales.
  3. Segundo. Remitir el expediente al Tribunal Administrativo del Atlantico para lo de su competencia y comunicar lo aqui decidido a la Sala de Casacion Laboral de la Corte Suprema de Justicia para los fines legales pertinentes.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.